Episode 50: Pro Se Litigants, AI, and the Future of Legal Assistance

Proof Over Precedent logo
Proof Over Precedent
Episode 50: Pro Se Litigants, AI, and the Future of Legal Assistance
Loading
/
Cartoon depicting a pro se litigant seeking help from AI, but AI is literally tied up in caution tape from UPL regulations
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

State bar associations typically file more UPL complaints than consumers. Given the intended aim of protecting consumers, UPL may actually be serving more as an obstacle and less as a protection for consumers using generative AI in the legal space. That’s the argument Wake Forest Law Professor and UPL expert Ellen Murphy makes in the latest Proof Over Precedent episode, where she identifies the legal industry’s progress with AI regulation by state and how AI and human counseling may combine to be the strongest access-to-justice resource.

Read the corresponding blog post.

Speakers:

Resources mentioned:

Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu

Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:

Support the A2J

Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal

Scroll to Top