/
RSS Feed
The low cost and accessibility of AI make it a potential game changer for pro se litigation and the future of affordable legal aid. But with the patchwork of state unauthorized practice of law (UPL) rules and no court resolution on AI’s UPL liability, it also faces an uncertain future as a legal tool. HLS students tackle the issue in the latest Proof Over Precedent and distinguish between legal information and legal advice—a key to general-purpose AI’s future in law.
Read the corresponding blog post.
Speakers:
- Elizabeth Guo, J.D. Candidate, Harvard Law School
- Sydney Nelson, J.D. Candidate, Harvard Law School
Resources mentioned:
- “Modernizing Unauthorized Practice of Law Regulations to Embrace AI-Driven Solutions and Improve Access to Justice”, AI Policy Consortium for Law & Courts, National Center for State Courts
- “Auto Clubs and the Lost Origins of the Access-to-Justice Crisis”, Yale Law Journal
Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu
Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:
Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal