Episode 56: The Conflicting Sides of Police Procedural Protections

Proof Over Precedent logo
Proof Over Precedent
Episode 56: The Conflicting Sides of Police Procedural Protections
Loading
/
Cartoon depicting a scale measuring the Law Enforcement Officer Bill of Rights, with public accountability being outweighed by police protections.
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

This bonus episode of Proof Over Precedent looks at the access to justice issues around the Law Enforcement Officer Bill of Rights (LEOBR) statutes and contract provisions that grant police officers enhanced procedural protections during internal misconduct investigations. At odds are the tensions between public accountability and officers’ claims of needing protection from false accusations. HLS student Strong Ma proposes a randomized controlled trial to study the effects on investigation outcomes, civil litigation, and perceived fairness.

Read the corresponding blog post.

Speakers:

  • Strong Ma, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School
  • Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

Resources mentioned:

Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu

Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:

Support the A2J

Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal

Scroll to Top