*Last week we tried to reintroduce our Top 10 A2J Research priorities YouTube series, but unfortunately posted the second video again. Here is the correct video, where Faculty Director Jim Greiner talks about triage in the criminal context. It’s been a couple weeks since we’ve posted a Top 10 video, so as a reminder, we at Read more about Correction: Top 10 A2J Research Priorities #3[…]
It’s been a busy couple of weeks for the Access to Justice Lab! In April we launched the Pre-Trial Release Study in Dane County, Wisconsin. A few weeks ago we launched Part 2 of the Debt Collection Default Study in multiple court locations in Massachusetts. We are now excited to officially announce the start of what could turn into the largest RCT ever conducted in the law: the Financial Distress Research Project (“FDRP”)!
The A2J Lab receives many comments, inquiries, and questions via the website. Most come from U.S. attorneys and researchers. From time to time, though, we are lucky to hear from others around the world committed to making their court systems more open and their legal procedures more transparent. One such kindred spirit is Jéssica Raiane, an attorney living in Goianésia, Goias, Brazil. She kindly has shared her thoughts on the challenges facing A2J proponents in her home country. The original Portuguese post is followed by an English translation.
And we’re off!
To set the scene: about 65-90% of people who are sued in debt collection proceedings across the country default, or lose their cases, because they don’t show up to court. At the BMC and many other courts in the Boston metro area, volunteer lawyers stand ready to assist defendants when they do show up. People might not show up for a variety of reasons. Maybe they think the debt is paid already. The plaintiff company might have the wrong person. The defendant is afraid of appearing in court. Or, she doesn’t know what’s expected of her from the Court Notice. Whatever the reason, access to justice surely suffers when half of the players don’t show up to the game.
A couple weeks ago, A2J Lab affiliate Daniel Bernal introduced some of the glaring gaps in access to justice that defendants in summary eviction proceedings experience in Arizona. This week, he dives a little deeper into his own fascinating research.
The Simpla Phi Solution
Five-years ago, Judge Dean Christoffel forged a partnership between the Pima County Superior Court, the University of Arizona, and the James E. Rogers College of Law with the explicit goal of making courts more accessible. This team took the name Simpla Phi Lex and primarily worked to revise pleading forms and create self-help materials for self-represented litigants.
It’s a good day for empiricism in the law! Professor Dalié Jiménez, an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Connecticut School of Law who works with the Lab on the Financial Distress Research Project (FDRP), was just awarded $25,000 through the Research Excellence Program at the University of Connecticut to support the FDRP. Read more about Research Award Granted for Financial Distress Research Project[…]
And we’re back with our Top 10 A2J Research Priorities YouTube series! This time, Faculty Director Jim Greiner talks about triage in the civil context. As a reminder, we at the Lab have come up with a list of what we consider to be the top 10 access to justice research priorities. This list will Read more about Top Ten A2J Research Priorities: #2[…]
Today we hear from A2J Lab Affiliate Daniel W. Bernal, a J.D./Ph.D. student at the James E. Rogers College of Law and the University of Arizona. Daniel has been conducting research on evictions in Arizona with an eye toward access gaps in summary proceedings. His research is culminating in an RCT (!) testing the effectiveness of self-help materials for pro se tenant litigants. We’ll hear from Daniel in a series of blog posts.
We at the Lab have come up with a list of what we consider to be the top 10 access to justice research priorities. It’s Monday morning. . . we won’t make you read about these. Instead, our top 10 list will be published weekly on our YouTube channel, in quick 2-3 minute videos to wake you Read more about Top 10 A2J Research Priorities: #1[…]
Why RCTs?: School Choice
Everyone seems to have an opinion on school choice. Those favoring or trying to forestall the dismantling of residential barriers have fought loud, hard battles in the states. Interestingly, these battles haven’t necessarily pitted political partisans against each other. The “choice” bloc recently witnessed a vocal spokesperson, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, rise to prominence. She has advocated passionately for implementing more voucher systems and giving parents and students more perceived opportunity to succeed where the current public school system, some claim, clearly cannot.